One approach to assessing progress towards sustainability makes use of multiple indicators spanning the
environmental, social, and economic dimensions of the system being studied. Diverse indicators have different
units of measurement, and normalization is the procedure employed to transform differing indicator
measures onto similar scales or to unit-free measures. Given the inherent complexity entailed in interpreting
information related to multiple indicators, normalization and aggregation of sustainability indicators
are common steps after indicator measures are quantified. However, it is often difficult for stakeholders
to make clear connections between specific indicator measurements and resulting aggregate scores of sustainability.
Motivated by challenges and examples in sustainability assessment, this paper explores various
normalization schemes including ratio normalization, target normalization, Z-score normalization, and unit
equivalence normalization. Methods for analyzing the impacts of normalization choice on aggregate scores
are presented. Techniques are derived for general application in studying composite indicators, and advantages
and drawbacks associated with different normalization schemes are discussed within the context of
sustainability assessment. Theoretical results are clarified through a case study using data from indicators
of progress towards bioenergy sustainability.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Pollesch and Dale 2016 EcoEcon.pdf1.2 MB
Contact Information
Contact Person: 
Virginia Dale
Contact Organization: 
Oak Ridge National Laboraotry
Publication Information
DOE Information
Bioenergy Category: